Details » Welcome To Afg-Watan.Net.ms

- Url: http://afgwatan.informe.com/
- Category: TV & Movies
- Description: Afg-Watan
- Members: 58
- Created On: Apr 10, 2007
- Posts: 14
- Hits: 13273
- Rating: 

Post your rating:
- Rating:          
- Comment:

- Verification Image:
- Verification Code:
 


User Comments:
1. | Jun 28, 2014
Other cneitrous such as Canada, most of Europe, Russia, China, South Korea, Austrailia, and some cneitrous in South America have universal health care, which either cost nothing or very little to their people. Health care is free in Canada and UK. Not sure about the rest of the cneitrous.US plans to make everyone buy health insurance. By having many participants, this should reduce the cost of buying health insurance. However, this is bad news for health insurance companies if the government creates their own health insurance company. The good news is that everyone will have access to health care for a low cost.References :
2. | Mar 19, 2014
As a Canadian, you right winged Americans floor me being the only 1st world cournty that does not tend to the health and well-being of its citizens. Don`t even get me started on the right winged propaganda that is shoved down your throats about how our Canadian health care system is apparently broken and flawed . Newsflash folks it works extremely well for us. You don`t see individual Canadians going bankrupt or in massive debt because they can`t pay their medical bills and EVERYONE gets medical care no, there are no waiting lines, we choose our on doctors etc .But yet you think nothing of spending trillions upon trillions of dollars on war in far away lands ..Go figure. America sure does have its priorities straight now doesn`t it folks!!References :
3. | Mar 18, 2014
The Supreme Court has traditionally itrtrpneeed the Commerce Clause very liberally. Congress can legislate something which affects interstate commerce, even if it is not interstate commerce in itself: the Court upheld a farmer being prosecuted for growing wheat on his own farm for his own consumption, in violation of federal wheat quotas. While you may consider the healthcare law against the spirit of the Constitution, legal precedent is not on your side.As far as the Amish go, they would likely be exempted from the provision. The Amish are also exempt from Social Security tax, for example, because they do not use Social Security as part of their religious beliefs. Was this answer helpful?
4. | Mar 17, 2014
I guess if it is not prohibited in the Constitution it could be aelowld. The constitution is a flexible thing, anyway. It is subject to changes, and it should be apparent that after more than 200 years, additions or modifications should be considered when needed. The world changes, and we must adapt and change with it in my opinion. Should we say that people with no health insurance will get no care unless they are wealthy? I guess that would be fair to the rest of us who are tired of carrying those who don't. Was this answer helpful?
5. | Nov 27, 2013
It isn't. I have a copy of the Constitution right here, and the only thing that vaguely could allow it is a seocitn that says Congress shall have the power to "provide for the general welfare." However, Obamacare doesn't PROVIDE for the general welfare, as it doesn't actually provide the healthcare. It PROMOTES the general welfare, in a round about way, but Congress does NOT have the power to promote the general welfare. It's illegal, Obama is guilty of treason and Constitutionally must be impeached. Was this answer helpful?
6. | Nov 25, 2013
you do realize in order to keep his psmiore that they would not go out of Business he just gave them 58 million more customers and if not the IRS will attach your refund and or fine you,where did I get the 58 mill you ask? you forget that he is fix en to give amnesty to immigrants unless of course the republicans did in their heels on it,what with all the violence in mexico right now and dead arizona man
7. | Nov 24, 2013
I guess if it is not prohibited in the Constitution it could be aoelwld. The constitution is a flexible thing, anyway. It is subject to changes, and it should be apparent that after more than 200 years, additions or modifications should be considered when needed. The world changes, and we must adapt and change with it in my opinion. Should we say that people with no health insurance will get no care unless they are wealthy? I guess that would be fair to the rest of us who are tired of carrying those who don't. Was this answer helpful?
8. | May 28, 2013
BPTFH6 mlikeytjcpuf
9. | May 26, 2013
One of the best options to codniser are health savings accounts. They combine a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) with a cash savings account which is investible in almost any kind of investment.You use the cash (which is put in, builds and spent tax free so long as it is on medical expenses) to pay off your medical expenses until you hit the deductible and then the health plan pays, except that routine care like doctor visits, etc. are covered first dollar by the health plan.As a small business there are tax advantages to the business for doing this and as an employee you get tax advantages and the ability to use the cash for whatever you want (up to 65 as long as you pay the tax when you take it out .after 65 it is like an IRA where you pay your post retirement tax bracket rate on withdrawls).You have to be diligent about funding the cash portion, but treat that part like an IRA account that you plan to build up and use for retirement.
10. | May 2, 2013
afWg5F uncxoefqcbsx
11. | Apr 30, 2013
Rodney is afraid of his own party As was poietnd out by Rep. Lance in a recent Star Ledger Article he [Lance] was told they (The R's) would find someone to run against him in next years primary. And I would bet Rodney has been told the same thing toe the line and speak only the talking points. Too bad. Rodney and the rest of the R's are quoting statistics provided by Heritage Foundation (very Right Wing Conservative and another is a subsidiary of United Health, no bias there)We need a public option and we should be looking at the approach used by Germany, or France, or the Swiss. No one in those countries go without heath coverage, no one dies because of a lack of insurance (45,000 in U.S. every year according to Harvard Study and Journal of Medicine, no one files for bankruptcy because of medical costs (700,000 plus in this Country every year).The free market [the question here is what free market when it comes to the health insurance market ; Adam Smith is laughing at us from the grave) has done damage to the country. The R's should be worried as the cost of insurance pushes jobs over seas or if the company can't move operations over seas then they just reduce or in many cases just drops the health insurance coverage. Then again as long as their (The R's) major contributors and the Chamber of Commerce is happy they don't really care. For 60-years , since Truman ,. who had started to push for universal health in 1947/48, the R's and the insurance industry have blocked any attempt to level the playing field. And today they the insurance companies are fat , dumb and happy with their ever expanding profits. Now if they could only figure out how to cut back on Medicare or even eliminate it they could die happy.The question is what type of country or society do we want to live in? The other major industrial counties in the world made that moral decision years ago now can we make the same moral decision and then move forward with a fair and equitable plan that protect not only those who can afford to pay but also the weakest and poorest in our society. I wonder if Rodney has the stomach or the courage to do just that and not worry about the next election or what his party thinks.
12. | Mar 7, 2012
pQamwl Really informative blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.